Friday, July 25, 2008

Lambeth diary: Rival strategies unveiled

http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/2008/07/25/lambeth-diary-rival-strategies-unveiled/

[Anglican Mainstream] 25 Jul 2008--The bishops of The Episcopal Church have come to the Lambeth Conference well- briefed on how to present their arguments cogently and persuasively in the indaba groups. Dr Philip Turner, former Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale, has written analysis of this for the Anglican Communion Institute, of which he is VP. The full briefing document is here .

Common Cause Partnership, Bishop Bob Duncan’s group, is petitioning Gafcon for province status, giving Gafcon virtual ecclesial authority. And I understand that when the next report of the Windsor Continuation Group is published next week, it will contain a ‘bombshell’ that will be pleasing to the conservative evangelial side but not so perhaps to the liberals.

There is also news from the Anglican Mainstream fringe meeting at the conference last night. Conservative evangelical bishops, who we were asked not to name, were told: ‘In indaba group after indaba group, find out how many people support resolution 1.10. [The one ten years ago that enforced a traditional, Biblical stance on gay sex.] I am putting my hand up in my indaba group, I invite my brothers and sisters to do the same when they get the opportunity.’ So it appears, you can take indaba out of Africa, but you can’t take good old democratic infighting out of the West. It’s business as usual at Lambeth, and one way or another, these 650 bishops are determined to have a vote and make it count.

According to Dr Turner, the TEC memo is ‘manifestly also a method designed to keep a large group of people “on message” so that TEC’s bishops will remain on the same page. It is manifest also that the memo signals a hardened position on the part of TEC’s Episcopal leadership that runs counter to the spirit the Archbishop of Canterbury has asked to guide the bishops in their deliberations—a spirit of mutual subjection in Christ that is open to correction.’

No comments: